The Broadway
naming business: Urinetown's branding strategy started out innocently
enough.
NEW YORK, June 2, 2002. The
hottest show on Broadway this season has a splendid title that plays against
all expectations: Urinetown. Here's an article from
yesterday's New York Times about the title and it's sketchy history:
It is a title so unsavory
that its creators say they chose it long ago as a kind of inoculation
against high expectations, as a means of deflecting any pressure that
might be brought on them to make it a success. "We thought that
with a name like 'Urinetown' there'd be no chance of having to show
it to our family and friends," said Greg Kotis, the author of the
book and lyrics.
...On the Tony Awards telecast
[tonight], the title will be treated like any other. "The determination
of taste falls within our minds," said Gary Smith, the executive
producer of the [CBS] broadcast. "I will agree and admit that the
first time you heard there's a show coming in called 'Urinetown,' you
went, 'Oh my goodness.' But you know what happens with titles, they
become part of our vocabulary. By now, it's part of our lexicon."
This is a great example of
the fact that names and brands do not live in a vacuum, but are surrounded
by a rich context that can even, in cases like this, turn a "bad"
name into a "good" thing. Indeed, if you had asked a focus group
to rank ten potential show titles before this show debuted, "Urinetown"
would have likely scored dead last. Now, however, this unsavory name has
become "part of our lexicon," part of the intrigue behind the
show, and probably a large part of its success.
|